One "series" I see on Twitter begins: "And in today's episode of: I Bet I Know Who You Voted For..." That is the common preface to re-Tweets of headlines that could previously have appeared in the "Darwin Awards" or perhaps the petty crime pages of a local paper. I'm pasting one below. It re-Tweets a Fox News Tweet that reads "Substitute allegedly brought boxed wine to school, vomited in class."
Another re-Tweets this Fox News Tweet: "Woman charged with choking teen for blocking view at Disney fireworks show."
On a related note, here's an item from Instagram just a few days ago, from the account called guerrillafeminism that reads "happy international women's day except the 53% of white women who voted for trump."
Pat Bagley, the cartoonist for the Salt Lake City Tribune (whose work I greatly admire, by the way--both cartoonist and paper), has referred to Trump's "idiot followers." I could provide many more illustrations of this phenomenon.
With that background, you can imagine my surprise--but also delight--when I saw this Tweet from Neera Tanden, President of the Center for American Progress, which bills itself as an
independent nonpartisan policy institute that is dedicated to improving the lives of all Americans, through bold, progressive ideas, as well as strong leadership and concerted action. Our aim is not just to change the conversation, but to change the country.Despite the "nonpartisan" billing, I see Center for American Progress as clearly left leaning (a good thing in my book!). Tanden's Tweet reads:
The teachers of West Virginia are heroes. They deserve good pay and a real raise. I stand with them.
Now, I don't recall any past Tweets by Tanden blasting Trump supporters, though I do recall some highly critical of Trump. That's fine by me. It's a line I've drawn myself--at least in the last year or so (I was a bit less discriminating--a bit more knee jerk--as I reeled in the wake of election of 2016) I readily take aim at Trump but try to be more thoughtful and circumspect re: Trump supporters. I'm looking to understand them, trying to listen empathically. (I've got a whole law review article forthcoming about female Trump supporters, delivered as the key note address at the Toledo Law Review symposium in October, 2017: The Women Feminism Forgot: Rural and Working Class White Women in the Era of Trump. I hope to have the text posted soon on my ssrn.com page).
But the bottom line is that some things I saw on Twitter about the West Virginia teachers--many sympathetic comments of the sort Tanden shared--had me wondering if the lefties doing this Tweeting realized that many of the folks they were lauding and advocating for had no doubt voted for Trump. That is, these newfound labor heroes with their wild-cat strike were one and the same with (many) reviled Trump voters. Some 68% of West Virginians voted for Trump! Could I possibly be seeing praise for these women--praise from the left? These are the same women that many lefties on Twitter have said "get what they deserve" if they lose their healthcare (thanks to Trump's effort to dismantle Obamacare) or face further economic decline (thanks, for example, to the long-term consequences of Trump's tax reform law).
(Btw, I was at an Appalachian Justice symposium at West Virginia University College of Law in Morgantown from Thursday Feb. 22 'til Saturday Feb. 24th, and I got to see the picketing--and hear the honking in support--first-hand, which was pretty cool. One of my favorite signs, this published in the Washington Post, is below )
Michelle Goldberg, a relatively new columnist at the New York Times who is writing a lot about gender issues, offered up this column under the headline, "The Teachers Revolt in West Virginia." She called the strike "thrilling," noting that strikes by teachers are unlawful in West Virginia, which became a right-to-work state a few years ago, and where unions do not have collective bargaining rights. Yet, Goldberg writes,
teachers and some other school employees in all of the state’s 55 counties are refusing to return to work until lawmakers give them a 5 percent raise, and commit to addressing their rapidly rising health insurance premiums.Goldberg further explains that the "obvious impetus" for action is West Virginia's awful pay of teachers, which ranks 48th in the nation (read more analysis here). She also discusses the critical role that health care/health insurance plays in the labor dispute:
In the past, solid health care benefits helped make up for low wages, but because West Virginia hasn’t been putting enough money into the state agency that insures public employees, premiums and co-payments have been increasing significantly.Ah, there's that health care problem again, by which I mean you should read this and this, among other sources cited and discussed in that forthcoming Toledo Law Review article.
Having pored over many, many mainstream media reports of white working class Trump supporters in places like Appalachia (you guessed it, all discussed in that Toledo Law Review article!), I was struck that the women Goldberg identified and interviewed did not appear to be Trump supporters. Quite to the contrary, these women are held out as having responded to Trump's election by becoming part of what is popularly known as "the resistance." I was delighted to learn about and hear from these women, but was Goldberg unable to find any Trump supporters among the striking teachers? I would very much have liked to have heard their attitudes about the strike, also in relation to their support for Trump. Did they reconcile the two?
Here are excerpts/quotes about the two women Goldberg did feature, Jenny Craig, a special education teacher from Triadelphia (population 811, northern panhandle) and Amanda Howard Garvin, an elementary art teacher in Morgantown (third largest city in the state, home of WVU):
Craig described the anti-Trump Women’s March, as well as the explosion of local political organizing that followed it, as a “catalyst” for at least some striking teachers.Goldberg quotes Craig:
You have women now taking leadership roles in unionizing, in standing up, in leading initiatives for fairness and equality and justice for everyone.Goldberg also quotes Garvin:
As a profession, we’re largely made up of women. ... There are a bunch of men sitting in an office right now telling us that we don’t deserve anything better.
Oh how I LOVE that quote. In the wake of Trump’s election, Garvin added, women are standing up to say:
No. We’re equal here.
I sure hope Garvin is right that the sentiment and movement are as widespread as she suggests--and as Goldberg implies. If this is accurate, liberal elites--including feminists--will have to give Craig, Garvin and so many more like them their due. (Indeed, teacher strikes may be in the works in the equally "red" states of Oklahoma and Kentucky, too). That will challenge deeply entrenched stereotypes about folks from this region (read more here and here), which will in turn serve all of us quite well.
By the way, the strike succeeded, with the teachers getting what they held out for. You can find more exciting coverage of the West Virginia teachers strike here, here and here. And don't miss this by WVU Law Professor and education law expert, Joshua Weishart.
The question that all of this leaves me with is this: What can the WV teachers strike teach us about how to build and sustain cross-class coalitions, including among whites? How can these intra-racial coalitions interface with cross-race coalitions for even stronger pacts among progressives? And what role will gender play in all of this coalition building?
Other hopeful news of change in relation to women and the national political landscape is here, here and here.