Sunday, March 11, 2018

A shortage of workers across America, and immigration as part of the solution

I kicked off the "Working Class Whites and the Law" blog back in January with this post about the shortage of workers willing to do crappy work.  This shortage is obviously integrally linked to immigration and should inform our nation's immigration policy.  If native-born workers (of whatever color) are not available to do the work that needs to be done to keep our economy(ies) booming, then immigrant labor is a necessity if economies are to grow, or even tread water.  And growth seems to be the buzzword of the era, whether or not the growth is sustainable and whether or not such growth is good for the planet.

Never mind those concerns.   Two recent stories from two very different places--California and Missouri--illustrate the need for laborers.   

First, the California story:  well, could be any number of stories, but I'll settle on Darrell Steinberg's interview with NPR on Thursday morning, following Attorney General Jeff Sessions' speech to a group of law enforcement officers in Sacramento on Wednesday. Steinberg defended Sacramento's stance as a "sanctuary city" by noting that the municipality is standing up for immigrants who, among other things, contribute to the economy:
It's the people living in our communities that have lived here, by the way, for decades. These are people going to school, people going to college, people who are contributing to our tax base. And we have an obligation to stand up for those people. And that's exactly what we're going to do.
Here's another California story that links immigration with the economy, this one out of the town of Jacumba Hot Springs, population  561

The Missouri story is datelined Branson, Missouri, population 10,520, the self-proclaimed "live entertainment capital of the world." The headline for the Washington Post story is "Why a white town paid for a class called "Hispanics 101'," and it is fundamentally about a labor shortage in southwest Missouri, a region I've frequently written about, e.g., here, herehere, here and here.  (It's a place of great interest to me because I grew up a little more than an hour away, in northwest Arkansas).   This Branson story, though by a different WaPo journalist, is somewhat similar in theme to this January report on a turkey processing plant in South Dakota recruiting Puerto Ricans to meet their labor needs.  The angle on Danielle Paquette's story out of Branson is that employers there are having to develop cultural sensitivity in order to recruit and retain Latinx workers, with a recent focus on those from Puerto Rico.  Here's an excerpt that explains that the economy depends on the success of the undertaking: 
As tourism season kicks off this month, the remote getaway known for dinner theaters, country music concerts and a museum of dinosaur replicas has 2,050 vacancies — and a lack of locals applying. 
So, like other areas with tight labor markets, Branson finds itself getting creative to fill jobs — in this case by recruiting people from a part of the United States with much higher unemployment.
But the plan to bring 1,000 workers from the island to overwhelmingly white, conservative Branson over the next three years has sparked unease, with critics saying that the newcomers will steal work from residents or drag down wages or bump up crime.
Paquette goes on to describe how desperate managers from Branson-area hotels, hospitals, hardware stores and banks have paid $50 each for the "Hispanic 101" workshop led by Miguel Joey Aviles.  Hilariously, Aviles is teaching his students--among other things--how to dance the merengue. 
Aviles advises bosses to check in often, ask about their mothers and request that grocery stores in the area sell plantains and Goya coconut water. 
“It’s not enough to invite them to the party,” Aviles said, twisting his body to the beat. “Bring them to the dance floor.”
Paquette goes on to focus on Branson's whiteness, with these details: 
[O]fficials acknowledge that some in the area, which is 92.4 percent white, are clinging to the past. Confederate flags adorn shop windows. A billboard outside town advertises “White Pride Radio.”

“We get nasty comments all the time,” said Heather Hardinger, programs director at the Taney County Partnership, which is working with the chamber on what it calls the “talent attraction” plan. 
States and companies from across the United States are competing for Puerto Rican workers, which had a jobless rate of nearly 11% in 2017, the highest in the nation. 

All of this highlights for me the gulf in understanding--broadly speaking--between California and Missouri, when it comes to the value--even necessity--of immigrant labor.  I'm also wondering how to bridge that gulf.  And I'm wondering--as I asked in that post back in early January--what happened to the good ol' working class whites who used to do jobs in places like Branson?  Have they succumbed to the meth (or other drug) epidemic (or here)?  gone soft?  moved to the city?  I'd like to know. 

Cross-posted to Legal Ruralism.

6 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really wonder how the disconnect happens for those people worried about welcoming 1,000 Puerto Ricans to Branson, when there are still 2,050 unfilled jobs (and a lack of locals applying) . Is this fear genuine? Does it come from a lack of understanding about the economic realities of the town? Are the wages not high enough for local workers? Is the work demeaning or unfulfilling (like the semi-automated, mind-deadening factory work we read about in class)... and therefore not desirable enough for American workers?

    Perhaps this discomfort is linked to a fear of change. According to US census data, Branson is currently about 90% white. In the 2000 census, the town was about 4% hispanic or latinx. By 2010 that percentage had doubled. I can only imagine the numbers have gone up since then. For those people who have lived in the town all their lives, I can only imagine this demographic shift is unsettling or resulting in culture shock. It's probably uncomfortable to be a "stranger" in your own town and dealing with customs or languages you never dealt with before.

    That said, I think it's heartening to see that there is some cultural "sensitivity" training happening (in a light-hearted fashion too! I want to take dance classes!). Hopefully programs like this will make the changes seem less scary and the locals can come to see the new residents as neighbors, rather than interlopers.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have serious concerns about the safety of the Puerto Ricans that will be added to the community of Branson Missouri under the city's plan. Bringing 1000 Hispanic workers to an overwhelmingly white/conservative town over a relatively short time frame is likely to make them targets of violence and harassment. If leaders in the community are serious about the plan, then real protections must be put into place to ensure these workers are protected in their new home. For example an effort should be made to pass new hate crime laws and the city should attempt to hire more officers of Hispanic descent from surrounding areas to patrol its streets.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree that immigration can be a valuable resource in filling jobs, particularly those that Americans refuse to fill. In fact, I am unsure why there is a preference for skilled immigrants. Should we not focus on immigrants that will fill jobs that Americans will not?

    Currently legal immigration programs are biased towards highly educated applicants who can fill highly skilled positions. These are often important positions that companies genuinely need filled by international candidates. However, other times these immigrants are sought because they will command lower salaries, or they will depress the salaries of American employees. Even when these immigrants can do a better job than a native born candidate, these positions will often be filled competently regardless. While these programs likely do benefit corporations and their shareholders, they have a clearly negative effect on those who lose out of jobs because of them.

    Contrast this with many of the low-skilled jobs that illegal immigrants tend to fill. These are positions that Americans literally do not want to work. Filling jobs that would otherwise lay dormant creates more of a benefit than performing slightly more competently at a position that would otherwise be filled.

    I have been thinking about immigration a lot recently because my family’s gardener was recently deported. He had worked for us for over twenty years and been in the country since the age of 13. Despite California’s status as a sanctuary state, and Santa Barbara’s as a sanctuary city, he somehow was still scooped up. If anyone knows any information about how to get repatriated after a deportation or any legal methods to help him, I would welcome advice on his behalf. I am not familiar with the details of his case but could likely obtain more information.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If you are like the vast majority of people on planet Earth then you will tend to view the world around and the universe at large as being solid however science has shown us conclusively that it is not. I am Affirmation

    ReplyDelete
  6. Did you check my new article dr. ryan shephard : I desire you may adore it :)

    ReplyDelete